MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979788119 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/691/1/261

<i>SUZAKU</i>OBSERVATIONS OF LOCAL ULTRALUMINOUS INFRARED GALAXIES

2009· article· en· W1979788119 on OpenAlexaff
Stacy H. Teng, Sylvain Veilleux, Naohisa Anabuki, C. D. Dermer, Luigi Gallo, Takao Nakagawa, C. S. Reynolds, D. B. Sanders, Yuichi Terashima, A. S. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyActive galactic nucleusSpectral lineQuasarLuminosityLuminous infrared galaxyInfraredAbsorption (acoustics)AstronomyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the results from our analysis of Suzaku X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS) (0.5–10 keV) and Hard X-ray Detector (HXD)/PIN (15–40 keV) observations of five well-known local ultraluminous infrared galaxies: IRAS F05189 − 2524, IRAS F08572 + 3915, Mrk 273, PKS 1345 + 12, and Arp 220. The XIS observations of F05189 − 2524 and Mrk 273 reveal strong iron lines consistent with Fe Kα and changes in spectral shapes with respect to previous Chandra and XMM-Newton observations. Mrk 273 is also detected by the HXD/PIN at ∼ 1.8σ. For F05189 − 2524, modeling of the data from the different epochs suggests that the change in spectral shape is likely due to the central source switching off, leaving behind a residual reflection spectrum, or an increase in the absorbing column. An increase in the covering fraction of the absorber can describe the spectral variations seen in Mrk 273, although a reduction in the intrinsic active galactic nucleus (AGN) luminosity cannot be formally ruled out. The Suzaku spectra of Mrk 273 are well fitted by a ∼ 94% covering fraction model with a column density of ∼ 1024 cm−2. The absorption-corrected log[L2-10keV/LIR] ratio is consistent with those found in PG Quasars. The 0.5–10 keV spectrum of PKS 1345 + 12 and Arp 220 seem unchanged from previous observations and their hard X-ray emission is not convincingly detected by the HXD/PIN. The large column density derived from CO observations and the large equivalent width of an ionized Fe line in Arp 220 can be reconciled by an ionized reflection model. F08572 + 3915 is undetected in both the XIS and HXD/PIN, but the analysis of unpublished Chandra data provides a new measurement at low energies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207