Les caractéristiques du syndicalisme minier français et son apport au mouvement ouvrier français
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In France, until 1914, the trade unionism of miners developed in an original way. It was a movement of industrial unionism characterized by a marked spirit of corporatism, which was soon organized on the national and international levels through federations of miners. The miners' movement had difficulties fitting in with other union organizations. The Confédération Nationale du Travail did not include miners until 1908. This late involvement resulted in part from the miners' own methods. Right from the start, they mobilized to obtain protective laws. Union organization and the strike were used as means of pressure in order to force Parlement and the government to take the miners' demands into account. Although such methods were not accepted by the more radical French labour legislation owes much to the battles of the miners. It was they who signed the first collective agreements and who practised systematic bargaining to resolve disputes over wages. By the power of their organization and commitment, the miners led the way to the sweeping trade unionism of today.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".