Translocation of the tetraspanin CD63 in association with human eosinophil mediator release
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tetraspanin CD63 (also known as LAMP-3) has been implicated in phagocytic and intracellular lysosome-phagosome fusion events. It is also present in eosinophils, with predominant expression on crystalloid granule membrane. However, its role in eosinophil function is obscure. We hypothesized that CD63 is associated with intracellular events involved in eosinophil activation and mediator release. We used a combination of confocal immunofluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry, and secretion assays, including beta-hexosaminidase, eosinophil peroxidase, and RANTES, to examine CD63 expression, intracellular localization, and its association with cell activation and mediator release. In resting eosinophils, CD63 immunoreactivity was localized to plasma and crystalloid granule membranes. In interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)- or C5a/CB-stimulated cells (10 minutes), intracellular CD63 appeared to shift to the cell periphery and plasma membrane, while stimulation with a cocktail of interleukin-3 (IL-3)/IL-5/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor induced the appearance of discrete intracellular clusters of CD63 immunoreactivity. IFN-gamma induced mobilization of CD63 to the cell periphery, which coincided with selective mobilization of RANTES prior to its release, implying CD63 association with piecemeal degranulation. Agonist-induced CD63 mobilization and cell surface up-regulation was associated with beta-hexosaminidase, eosinophil peroxidase, and RANTES release. Dexamethasone as well as genistein (a broad-spectrum inhibitor of tyrosine kinases) inhibited agonist-induced intracellular mobilization of CD63 and RANTES together with cell surface up-regulation of CD63 and mediator release. This is the first report of an association between CD63 mobilization and agonist-induced selective mediator release, which may imply the involvement of CD63 in eosinophil activation and piecemeal degranulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".