Les confidences de Zéro Legel, ou la poésie à bas bruit de Gilbert Langevin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'une des particularités de l'univers de Gilbert Langevin consiste dans la création d'un double énigmatique, Zéro Legel (et de tout un cortège d'alias), qui accompagnera son oeuvre poétique de ses commencements jusqu à la toute fin. Non sans raison, ces Écrits de Zéro Legel — fragments, aphorismes, proses diverses — ont souvent suscité un certain malaise chez les lecteurs de Langevin. Cette étude examine la première réception de ces textes inclassables et iconoclastes, et tente de réévaluer leur portée à partir des enjeux textuels mais aussi philosophiques qui y étaient engagés pour le poète. Relus dans cette perspective, l'investissement onomastique, les jeux de mots et autres détournements de maximes et de lieux communs pratiqués de manière extensive par Langevin témoignent surtout exemplairement de son rapport à la langue, les rapports troubles entre nom et identité de Zéro Legel relevant dès lors de la même opération qui pousse le poète à constamment s'affronter, à travers proverbes et aphorismes, à la loi de la langue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".