PERFORMANCE ESTIMATION TOOLS FOR: DECOUPLING BY FILTERING OF TEMPERATURE AND EMISSIVITY (DEFILTE), AN ALGORITHM FOR THERMAL HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE PROCESSING
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The construction of very good hyperspectral sensors operating in the thermal infrared bands from 8 to 12 microns arouses much interest for the development of data exploitation tools. Temperature emissivity separation (TES) algorithms are very important components of a future toolbox, because they make it possible to extract these two fundamental targets’ parameters. The emissivity relies on the nature of the target's surface materials, while the temperature gives information related to their use and relationship with the environment. The TES technique presented in this paper is based on iteration on temperature principle, where a total square error criterion is used to estimate the temperature. The complete procedure is described in the paper. Its sensitivity to noise is studied and a mathematical behavior model is provided. The model is validated through a Monte-Carlo simulation of the technique's operation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it