Ab Initio Conformational Space Study of Model Compounds of O-Glycosides of Serine Diamide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Relative stabilities of rotamers of the N-acetyl-O-(2-acetamido-2-deoxy-alpha-D-galactopyranosyl)-L-seryl-N'-methyl amide (1) and eleven analogous molecules containing beta-galactose, alpha- and beta-mannose, alpha- and beta-glucose, and L-threonine were calculated to learn whether they could explain the natural preference for 1 in linkages between the carbohydrate and protein in glycoproteins. The lowest energy rotamers of four O-glycoside models of serine diamide were identified with a Monte Carlo search coupled with molecular mechanics (MM2*). These rotamers were further optimized with an ab initio level of theory (HF/6-31G(d)). Subsequently, B3LYP/6-31 + G(d) single point energies were calculated for the most stable HF structures. The most favorable interactions are present in 1 and its glucose analogue. The monosaccharide for the carbohydrate antenna is anchored to the serine residue with an AcNH...O=C-NHMe hydrogen bond in the most stable rotamers. The mannose analogue and the beta-anomers are considerably less stable according to the MM2* and especially to the ab inito energy values. The three analogues have HF/6-31 G(d) energies which are 4-6 kcal mol-1 higher; the single point B3LYP/6-31 + G(d)//HF/6-31 G(d) calculations yield preferences of 3-5 kcal mol-1 for 1. The most stable L-threonine analogues show a behaviour very similarly to the corresponding serine analogues. The ZPE and thermal correction components of the calculated delta H298 and delta G298 values are relatively small (< 0.4 kcal mol-1). However, the T delta S298 term can be as large as 2.6 kcal mol-1. The entropy terms stabilize the alpha-anomers relative to beta-anomers, and ManNAc relative to GalNAc. The largest stabilization effect is observed for one of the rotamers of the alpha-anomer of ManNAc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".