MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979939623 · doi:10.5539/apr.v6n3p127

On a New Source of Electromagnetic Radiation: Experimental Evidence

2014· article· en· W1979939623 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsElectromagnetismType (biology)Mechanism (biology)Classical electromagnetismClassical mechanicsElectromagnetic fieldMagnetic fieldCharged particleMovement (music)Charge (physics)Magnetic radiation reaction forceRadiationComputational physicsMechanicsQuantum electrodynamicsCyclotron radiationQuantum mechanicsIonAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electromagnetism deals with three very different types of fields: “static”, “kinematical”, and “dynamical”. Fields of the first type originate in a stationary body—charged or magnetized. Fields of the second type arise from a uniform movement of a body—also charged or magnetized. Fields of the third type arise due to the accelerated movement of a charge, for instance, in an oscillatory LC-circuit. In the present paper we offer an experimental proof for existence in nature of a dynamical source which comes entirely from another mechanism. The fundamentals of this mechanism lie in the accelerated movement of a system of elementary currents, which are responsible for the appearance of macroscopic magnetization. This finding gives rise to a new method of studying magnetic materials and their structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it