Studies on fluid extravasation related to induced hypothermia during cardiopulmonary bypass in piglets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypothermia, commonly used for organ protection during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), has been associated with changes in plasma volume, hemoconcentration and microvascular fluid shifts. Fluid pathophysiology secondary to hypothermia and the mechanisms behind these changes are still largely unknown. In a recent study we found increased fluid needs during hypothermic compared to normothermic CPB. The aim of the present study was to characterize the distribution of the fluid given to maintain normovolemia. In addition, we wanted to investigate the quantity and quality of the fluid extravasated during hypothermic compared to normothermic CPB. METHODS: Two groups of anesthetized piglets were studied during 2 h of hypothermic (28 degrees C) (n=7) or normothermic (38 degrees C) (n=7) CPB. Net fluid balance (input-output) was recorded. Changes in colloid osmotic pressures of plasma (COPp) and interstitial fluid (COPi), plasma volume (PV), hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (HCT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), s-osmolality, s-albumin and s-total protein was followed throughout the experiments. Fluid extravasation rate was calculated. In addition, total tissue water content was measured and compared with a control group (n=6) (no CPB). RESULTS: During hypothermic compared with normothermic CPB, the average net positive fluid balance from 10-120 min of extracorporeal circulation was 1.35+/-0.06 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1) and 0.33+/-0.03 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1) respectively (P<0.0001). We found a marked increase in fluid extravasation during hypothermic CPB. The extravasation rate during hypothermia was 1.8+/-0.2 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1), (1st hour) and 1.1+/-0.2 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1) (2nd hour) compared with 0.8+/-0.2 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1), and 0.1+/-(0.1) ml x kg(-1) x min(-1) during normothermia, respectively (P<0.01). The total intravascular protein and albumin masses remained constant in both groups. Following hypothermic CPB, the water content increased significantly in all tissues and organs. CONCLUSION: During hypothermic CPB an increased extravasation of fluid from the intravascular to the interstitial space was found. As no leakage of proteins could be demonstrated, based on stable values for albumin and protein masses throughout the experiments, the extravasated fluid contained mainly water and small solutes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".