MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979960625 · doi:10.1117/12.606410

A wavelet integrated image fusion approach for target detection in very high resolution satellite imagery

2005· article· en· W1979960625 on OpenAlexaff
Yun Zhang, Gang Hong

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPanchromatic filmMultispectral imageImage fusionRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceMultispectral pattern recognitionImage resolutionComputer scienceComputer visionWaveletWavelet transformSatellite imageryGeologyImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Commercially available very high resolution satellite imagery has reached a sub-meter ground resolution for panchromatic imagery and a few meters of resolution for multispectral imagery (e.g., QuickBird panchromatic 0.6m and multispectral 2.4m). Ground targets such as vehicles can be clearly recognized in the panchromatic imagery, but difficult in the multispectral imagery. For automatic target detection, however, it is desired to have sub-meter multispectral imagery. This paper introduces a new wavelet integrated image fusion approach to produce a sub-meter multispectral image by combining a sub-meter panchromatic image with a several-meter multispectral image. The characteristics of the wavelet transform for spatial detail extraction and advantages of the IHS (Intensity Hue Saturation) fusion techniques are integrated. QuickBird panchromatic and multispectral images are fused. The results are compared with those of other existing image fusion techniques. Visual analyses demonstrate that the new wavelet integrated approach achieves better results for target detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Image Fusion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207