MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979961505 · doi:10.1504/ijvsmt.2005.008575

Off-road lateral stability analysis of an articulated steer vehicle with a rear-mounted load

2005· article· en· W1979961505 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Vehicle Systems Modelling and Testing · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDamperEngineeringStiffnessStructural engineeringLeaf springSpring (device)Structural loadArticulated vehicleVibrationControl theory (sociology)Automotive engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsTruckAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To investigate the lateral stability of an articulated steer vehicle with a rear-mounted load, a linearised model of a forestry skidder carrying a log is devised. In this model, a torsional spring and damper are used to represent the stiffness and damping in the hydraulic cylinders at the articulation joint. The results show that when the vehicle is carrying a rear-mounted load, the oscillatory instability or snaking may occur at lower vehicle speeds. However, when the torsional spring stiffness or damping at the articulation angle is increased to an appropriate value, the snaking can be removed or delayed to higher speeds. To verify the results from the analysis of the linearised model, the motion of a virtual prototype of the vehicle is simulated in ADAMS/View. The results from the simulations and linear stability analysis are consistent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it