MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979969975 · doi:10.1061/41130(369)197

Elbow River Cable-Stayed Bridge, Calgary, Canada

2010· article· en· W1979969975 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2010 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)DeckPierDowntownLimitingSpan (engineering)EngineeringScheduleCivil engineeringStructural engineeringComputer scienceGeographyMechanical engineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elbow River Bridge is a single-span, cable-stayed bridge spanning the Elbow River near Downtown Calgary, Alberta. The bridge has a span of 48.5 metres (m) and is the first vehicular cable-stayed bridge in Alberta. Limiting roadway elevations at the top of the deck and free-board limits at the bottom left very little room for deck thickness. A cable-stayed bridge was suggested as an option by the design team, as it reduced the deck-thickness requirement and eliminated the need for a pier in the river, which also helped with the tight construction schedule. The project delivery method was similar to design-build except that both the consulting engineer (CH2M HILL) and the contractor (Graham Construction) were hired by the owner. This paper describes the different aspects of the bridge's design and construction, including the selection and design of main components, analysis of the bridge, and interaction between design and construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it