MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979971952 · doi:10.1517/17425250903124355

Budesonide for Crohn's disease

2009· review· en· W1979971952 on OpenAlexaff
Cynthia H. Seow, Eric I. Benchimol, A. Hillary Steinhart, Anne M. Griffiths, Anthony Otley

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBudesonideMedicineCrohn's diseaseGastrointestinal tractDiseaseAdverse effectInflammatory bowel diseaseInflammationGastroenterologyInternal medicineBioavailabilityCorticosteroidImmunologyPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crohn's disease is characterized by recurrent transmural inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, most commonly, the terminal ileum and the colon. Therapy is aimed at breaking the cycle of inflammation by inducing and maintaining remission. Current effective therapies include systemic corticosteroids, but this class of drugs is associated with a variety of adverse effects, which may lead to significant morbidity and even mortality. Budesonide, a potent corticosteroid designed to have location specific delivery to the gastrointestinal tract, has limited systemic bioavailability largely due to its extensive first pass metabolism and has been demonstrated to be a safer alternative to conventional corticosteroids and of proven efficacy in the induction of remission in mild to moderate Crohn's disease. However, budesonide is not effective in maintaining remission in patients with Crohn's disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & ToxicologySame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207