MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Developmental disinhibition: Turning off inhibition turns on breathing in vertebrates

2000· article· en· W1979992258 on OpenAlex
Christian Straus, Richard J. A. Wilson, John E. Remmers

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurobiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisinhibitionBiologyNeuroscienceMetamorphosisBreathingInhibitory postsynaptic potentialAntagonistReceptorDevelopmental profileEndocrinologyAnatomyGeneticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Development requires age-dependent changes in essential behaviors. While the mechanisms determining the developmental expression of such behavior in vertebrates remain largely unknown, a few studies have identified permissive mechanisms in which the appearance of promoting signals activates pre-established networks. Here we report a different developmental process. Specifically, we show that the neuronal substrate that produces putative lung breathing in tadpoles is formed early in development, but remains more or less inactive until metamorphosis because of suppression mediated by a GABA(B) receptor-dependent mechanism. Blocking this suppression using 2-hydroxy-saclofen, a GABA(B) receptor antagonist, results in the precocious production of the putative lung breathing motor pattern. This blocker failed to augment putative lung breaths after metamorphosis. Thus, our results suggest that loss of an inhibitory signal during development (i.e., developmental disinhibition) is responsible for the developmental expression of air breathing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it