MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980002700 · doi:10.1159/000244127

Prostaglandin E <sub>2</sub> in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Fetal and Newborn Sheep: Central versus Peripheral Source

2009· article· en· W1980002700 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Jones, S. Lee Adamson, Isis Bishai, Doreen Engelberts, Jennifer L. Norton, Flavio Coceani

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Neonate · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCerebrospinal fluidPeripheralFetusMedicineProstaglandin EProstaglandinPregnancyInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the perinatal period, prostaglandin (PG) E2 levels show parallel changes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood which may be important for the adaptation of the fetus to extrauterine life. It is not known, however, whether PGE2 in the CSF originates from a local or a peripheral source. Experiments were carried out in term fetal and newborn sheep chronically instrumented with a cannula inside the third ventricle and vascular lines. Indomethacin was given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) (50 or 100 micrograms at hourly intervals), alone or in combination with intravenous (i.v.) PGE2 (1 or 1.5 micrograms/kg/min). In the fetus, i.c.v. indomethacin reduced PGE2 levels in both CSF and plasma. Conversely, no significant change was noted at either site when indomethacin was given i.c.v. to the newborn. At both ages, PGE2 increased in the CSF during i.v. infusion of the compound, but this elevation was proportionately smaller than in plasma. We conclude that, in the perinatal period, brain and peripheral circulation function as separate compartments with respect to PGE2, though there is passage of the compound across the blood-brain barrier. Results provide indirect evidence that perinatal brain produces PGE2 in measurable amounts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of the NeonateSame topicPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207