MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparison of Three Digestion Methods For the Recovery of 17 Plant Essential Nutrients And Trace Elements from Six Composts

2002· article· en· W1980009252 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCompost Science & Utilization · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Department of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAshingDigestion (alchemy)ChemistrySewage sludgeNitric acidCompostStrawManureNitrogenFertilizerEnvironmental chemistryNutrientAgronomySewageEnvironmental scienceChromatographyEnvironmental engineeringInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comparative investigation for recovery of 17 elements by using three digestion methods (nitric acid, nitric/perchloric acid and dry ashing) in six mature composts was conducted. The elements measured were Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na, As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Se and Zn. Two of the composts were prepared from mixtures of racetrack manure and sewage sludge. Another compost was developed from a mixture of food waste and straw with the addition of nitrogen fertilizer. The remaining three were MSW (municipal solid waste) composts from the Lunenburg Regional Recycling and Composting Facility, Nova Scotia, prepared in 1995, 1996 and 1997, matured, and used in the subsequent year. There were no significant differences between the three digestion procedures in the recovery of Ca, K, Na, and Hg. HNO3 digestion provided the highest recovery of As, Mo, Ni and Se, HNO3/HClO4 provided the highest recovery of Co, while dry ashing provided the highest recovery of Mn. For Cd and Pb, both HNO3 and HNO3/HClO4 provided similar and better recovery than dry ashing. For Cr, higher values were obtained by using dry ashing or HNO3/HClO4 digestion, while for Mg, HNO3 and dry ashing provided similar and better recovery than the HNO3/HClO4 digestion procedure. For Cu and Zn, HNO3 was superior to HNO3/HClO4 digestion, while dry ashing was not significantly different from the other two procedures. For Fe, dry ashing provided better recovery than HNO3. Element recovery depended not only on the digestion procedure, but also on the type of compost. Overnight presoaking of the compost samples in concentrated nitric acid at room temperature prior to heating did not improve the element recovery. The results show that when comparing the three methods, nitric acid digestion is sufficient for the recovery of the greatest number of elements in various composts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it