MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980063815 · doi:10.3828/bjcs.2011.14

Tableaux d'enfance dans le lointain: le pays du cœur dans l'arrière-pays de <i>Pieds nus dans l'aube</i>

2011· article· fr· W1980063815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Caumartin

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Canadian Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La modernite quebecoise est largement definie par l'opposition de reperes esthetiques. La rupture entre rural et urbain a marque un imaginaire territorial qui laisse peu d'espace a l'invention de soi caracteristique de la modernite. Cet article interroge la pertinence de cette distinction et invite a la repenser en fonction des espaces periurbains du Quebec. Le caractere operatoire de cette categorie geoesthetique sera illustre par une relecture de Pieds nus dans l'aube (1946) de Felix Leclerc et un examen de la fortune critique de ce classique de la litterature quebecoise. La Haute-Mauricie de Pieds nus dans l'aube se presente comme un territoire aux frontieres floues par rapport a l'urbanite, un territoire presque problematique par les liens qu'il entretient simultanement a la tradition et a l'imaginaire. Loin de s'associer au roman du terroir, a l'espace de l'habitant ou du colon, Pieds nus dans l'aube presente l'espace de l'enfance qui s'invente un monde au fil des rencontres et des explorations, un e...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Canadian StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207