Explicit feature mapping via multi-layer perceptron and its application to Mine-Like Objects detection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a novel learning method is introduced that borrows simultaneously from the principles of kernel methods and multi-layer perceptron. Specifically, the method implements the feature mapping idea of kernel methods into a multi-layer perceptron. Unlike in kernel learning where the feature space is usually invisible and inaccessible, the multilayer perceptron based mapping is explicit. Therefore, the proposed model can be learned directly in feature space. Together with the inherent sparse representation, the proposed approach will thus be much faster and easier to train even in the event of a large network size. The proposed approach is applied in the context of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Mine-Like Objects detection task. The results show that the proposed approach is able to improve upon the generalization performance of neural network based methods. Its prediction results are also close to or better than those obtained by kernel machines. Its learning and classification speed is shown to far surpass those of kernel machines. These results are confirmed on a number of experiments involving benchmarking UCI domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it