Regulation effects on the lower Peace River, Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The headwaters of the Peace River, Canada became regulated in 1968 by a major hydroelectric facility and associated reservoir located in the Rocky Mountains. This paper examines the change to the downstream hydrographs that have resulted from regulation. To facilitate the comparison, a naturalized (without regulation effects) flow regime (1972–1996) was generated using a combination of hydrologic and hydraulic flow models. The results showed that even some 1100 km downstream, there have been significant changes to the hydrograph. Specifically, average winter flows were 250% higher, annual peaks (1‐day, 15‐day, 30‐day highs) were in the order of 35–39% lower, and overall variability in daily flows decreased. Despite the reduction in peaks and variability, however, the downstream hydrograph is far from flat and has retained the basic shape of the pre‐regulation hydrograph. This is primarily due to the strong influence of tributary inflow below the point of regulation. Recommendation for improvements to the model and future application of these data are also discussed. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it