MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sensitivity of AXB/BXA recombinant inbred lines of mice to the locomotor activating effects of cocaine: a quantitative trait loci analysis

2001· article· en· W1980125207 on OpenAlexafffund
A. E. Boyle, Kathryn Gill

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacogenetics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsQuantitative trait locusInbred strainCongenicBiologyRecombinant DNAGeneticsGeneMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study was conducted in order to characterize putative quantitative trait loci (QTL) for cocaine-induced activation in the AXB/BXA recombinant inbred (RI) lines of mice. Locomotor activity was measured in the AXB/BXA and progenitor A/J and C57BL/6J strains using a computerized open-field apparatus following saline or cocaine (0, 5, 10, 20 mg/kg) administration (i.p.). Analyses were conducted on phenotypes including both novelty (responses under initial saline conditions) and cocaine-induced locomotor activity. Significant differences were observed across RI lines on all measures. Gender differences in sensitivity to the activating effects of cocaine were not observed. The wide and continuous distributions of phenotypic responses in the AXB/BXA RI lines suggested polygenic regulation. Initial basal locomotor activity was significantly correlated with cocaine-induced activation (raw scores) (r = 0.60, P = 0.0021) but not with cocaine difference scores (r = 0.370, P = 0.082). Simple regression and interval mapping were used to initially identify significant gene markers associated with novelty and cocaine-induced activation. Subsequently, composite interval mapping was used to increase the accuracy in mapping individual loci. QTL analysis of cocaine-induced activation (difference scores--20 mg/kg dose) identified significant loci on chromosomes 12 (23 cM), and 15 (46.8 cM). The significant QTLs were identified on chromosomes 12 and 15 map to regions in proximity to genes for the somatostatin 1 (Smstr1 -23 cM) and 3 (Smstr3 -46.3 cM) receptors, respectively. Further research employing AcB/BcA recombinant congenic lines of mice will be employed to confirm the QTL on chromosomes 12 and 15 identified in the present study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacogeneticsSame topicGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsFrench-language works237,207