MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980139141 · doi:10.1130/g25481a.1

Tide- and wave-generated fluid mud deposits in the Tilje Formation (Jurassic), offshore Norway

2009· article· en· W1980139141 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aitor A. Ichaso, Robert W. Dalrymple

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationGeologyIconSubmarine pipelinePaleontologyQueen (butterfly)DownloadOceanographyArchaeologyLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebHistoryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| June 01, 2009 Tide- and wave-generated fluid mud deposits in the Tilje Formation (Jurassic), offshore Norway Aitor A. Ichaso; Aitor A. Ichaso 1Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Robert W. Dalrymple Robert W. Dalrymple 1Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Geology (2009) 37 (6): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1130/G25481A.1 Article history received: 28 Aug 2008 rev-recd: 16 Jan 2009 accepted: 22 Jan 2009 first online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Aitor A. Ichaso, Robert W. Dalrymple; Tide- and wave-generated fluid mud deposits in the Tilje Formation (Jurassic), offshore Norway. Geology 2009;; 37 (6): 539–542. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G25481A.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract The Tilje Formation (Early Jurassic; 120–300 m thick) consists predominantly of heterolithic deposits and is thought to have accumulated in tide-dominated estuarine and deltaic environments in an active rift setting. Anomalously thick (>0.5 cm) and internally structureless mudstone layers, which are interpreted to represent fluid-mud deposits, are widespread and occur in three different environmental settings: (1) in the basal part of upward-fining tidalfluvial channels where they generate upward-sanding successions: (2) in the deposits of mouth bars and terminal distributary channels where they are associated with the coarsest sands and the least-bioturbated sediments, suggesting deposition during tidally modulated river floods; and (3) in delta-front successions where they immediately overlie thick, wave-generated storm beds, suggesting that these fluid-mud deposits result from wave resuspension of previously deposited mud. These observations provide criteria for the recognition of ancient fluid-muds and for interpreting their origin. The tectonic setting may be responsible for their abundance. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations188
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207