MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Provider and Physician: Title Use in HMO Provider Panels

2001· article· en· W1980159380 on OpenAlexaff
Laura E. Shay

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Nurse Practitioner · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNursing Roles and Practices
Canadian institutionsKimberly-Clark (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhoneAssociate editorLibrary scienceArtComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NP-News Editor-in-Chief: Linda Pearson, RN, FNP, MSN Department Editor: Marilyn Edmunds, NP, PhD Editorial Director: Kimberly Callan Associate Editor: Lorna Sapp Murray Copy Editor: Nadia Blahut, Thomas Mitchell Art Director: Lisa A. Witter Readers wishing to report news or story ideas should contact Lorna Sapp Murray, NP News, 1111 Bethlehem Pike, P.O. Box 908, Springhouse, PA 19477; phone, 215-646-8700, ext. 1291; fax, 215-654-1365; E-mail, [email protected]. "The definitive source for professional information" ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author acknowledges Tracy MacGregor, CRNP; Barbara Galen, CRNP; Jennifer Loud, CRNP; and Marilyn Edmunds, NP, PhD, for their valuable input.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2500.074

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Nurse PractitionerSame topicNursing Roles and PracticesFrench-language works237,207