MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980167095 · doi:10.7202/1024939ar

Apocalypses et fins de monde : enjeux de santé mentale

2014· article· fr· W1980167095 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Viviane Annie Lew

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicParanormal Experiences and Beliefs
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La problématique apocalyptique n’est pas sans interpeller le champ de la santé mentale. Les idéologies dans de nombreuses sectes s’appuient sur des images et des interprétations bibliques mais aussi des représentations post-modernes faisant référence aux extraterrestres et aux OVNI. Leurs leaders charismatiques présentent aussi des profils psychologiques problématiques qui peuvent les entraîner, tout comme leurs adeptes, à des conduites extrêmes. Les inquiétudes liées aux innovations technologiques comme les armes nucléaires, la détérioration de l’environnement de même que les annonces médiatiques peuvent entrainer des réactions anxiogènes qui affectent le bien-être des personnes. Les délires incluant des références apocalyptiques et de fin de monde se retrouvent aussi chez des patients souffrant de troubles psychotiques. Ces enjeux sont discutés en s’appuyant sur des exemples historiques et contemporains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontièresSame topicParanormal Experiences and BeliefsFrench-language works237,207