MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multiband Order Parameters for the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>PrOs</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Sb</mml:mi><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>PrRu</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Sb</mml:mi><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>Skutterudite Superconductors from Thermal Conductivity Measurements

2008· article· lv· W1980178994 on OpenAlexaff
R. W. Hill, Shiyan Li, M. B. Maple, Louis Taillefer

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsOrder (exchange)SuperconductivityCondensed matter physicsQuasiparticleSkutteruditeThermal conductivityMaterials scienceThermodynamicsThermoelectric materials

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermal conductivity measurements were performed on single crystal samples of the superconducting filled-skutterudite compounds ${\mathrm{PrOs}}_{4}{\mathrm{Sb}}_{12}$ and ${\mathrm{PrRu}}_{4}{\mathrm{Sb}}_{12}$ both as a function of temperature and transverse magnetic field. In a zero magnetic field, the low temperature electronic thermal conductivity of ${\mathrm{Pr}\mathrm{Ru}}_{4}{\mathrm{Sb}}_{12}$ is consistent with a fully gapped Fermi surface. For ${\mathrm{Pr}\mathrm{Os}}_{4}{\mathrm{Sb}}_{12}$, residual electronic conduction in the zero-temperature limit is consistent with the presence of nodes in the superconducting energy gap. The electronic thermal conductivity for both compounds shows a rapid rise at low magnetic fields. In ${\mathrm{Pr}\mathrm{Ru}}_{4}{\mathrm{Sb}}_{12}$, this is interpreted in terms of multiband effects. In ${\mathrm{Pr}\mathrm{Os}}_{4}{\mathrm{Sb}}_{12}$, we consider the Doppler shift of nodal quasiparticles and multiband effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.008
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0080.006
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1230.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207