MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980186650 · doi:10.3917/ds.334.0501

Signalement d'enfants aux services de protection de la jeunesse : quels acteurs sont influencés par la couverture journalistique de la maltraitance ?

2010· article· fr· W1980186650 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie‐Christine Saint‐Jacques, Daniel Turcotte, Sylvie Drapeau, Hans Ivers

Bibliographic record

VenueDéviance et Société · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Deviance, and Social Control
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans les dernières années, le Canada, tout comme la France, ont enregistré une haussedu nombre d’enfants victimisés, signalés aux autorités. Cet article examine l’hypothèsevoulant que les histoires d’enfants maltraités publiées par les médias ont conscientiséla population à signaler davantage les cas de victimation. Il s’appuie sur l’analyse del’entrée quotidienne des signalements (N = 11563) durant deux années dans un centrede protection de l’enfance de même que sur la couverture médiatique de la protection dela jeunesse dans la presse écrite. Les résultats font état d’un impact modéré des médiassur les signalements d’enfants, l’ampleur de cette relation variant selon la catégorie depersonnes qui signalent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDéviance et SociétéSame topicCrime, Deviance, and Social ControlFrench-language works237,207