Expression profile of protein kinase C isozymes in preimplantation mouse development
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the preimplantation mouse embryo, the protein kinase C (PKC) family has been implicated in regulation of egg activation, progression of meiotic and mitotic cell cycles, embryo compaction, and blastulation, but the involvement of the individual isozymes is largely unknown. Here, using semiquantitative immunocytochemistry and confocal microscopy we analyze the relative amount and subcellular distribution of ten isozymes of PKC (alpha, betaI, betaII, gamma, delta, epsilon, eta, theta, zeta, iota/lambda) and a PKC-anchoring protein, receptor for activated C-kinase 1 (RACK1). Our results show that all of these isoforms of PKC are present between the two-cell and blastocyst stages of mouse preimplantation development, and that each has a distinct, dynamic pattern and level of expression. The data suggest that different complements of the isozymes are involved in various steps of preimplantation development, and will serve as a framework for further functional studies of the individual isozymes. In particular, there was a transient increase in the nuclear concentration of several isozymes at the early four-cell stage, suggesting that some of the PKC isozymes might be involved in regulation of nuclear organization and function in the early mouse embryo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it