Identification of Repair Enzymes for 5-Formyluracil in DNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
5-Formyluracil (5-foU) is a potentially mutagenic lesion of thymine produced in DNA by ionizing radiation and various chemical oxidants. Although 5-foU has been reported to be removed from DNA by Escherichia coli AlkA protein in vitro, its repair mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, we used the borohydride trapping assay to detect and characterize repair activities for 5-foU in E. coli extracts with site-specifically designed oligonucleotides containing a 5-foU at defined sites. The trapping assay revealed that there are three kinds of proteins that form covalent complexes with the 5-foU-containing oligonucleotides. Extracts from strains defective in the nth, nei, or mutM gene lacked one of the proteins. All of the trapped complexes were completely lost in extracts from the nth nei mutM triple mutant. The introduction of a plasmid carrying the nth, nei, or mutM gene into the E. coli triple mutant restored the formation of the corresponding protein-DNA complex. Purified Nth, Nei, and MutM proteins were trapped by the 5-foU-containing oligonucleotide to form the complex in the presence of NaBH(4). Furthermore, the purified Nth, Nei, and MutM proteins efficiently cleaved the oligonucleotide at the 5-foU site. In addition, 5-foU was site-specifically incorporated into plasmid pSVK3, and the resulting plasmid was replicated in E. coli. The mutation frequency of the plasmid was significantly increased in the E. coli nth nei mutM alkA mutant, compared with the wild-type and alkA strains. From these results it is concluded that the Nth, Nei, and MutM proteins are involved in the repair pathways for 5-foU that serve to avoid mutations in E. coli.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".