Bibliographic record
Abstract
A weakly nonlinear interfacial wave propagating between two dielectric fluids and influenced by an oblique electric field is studied. The analysis considers the surface tension and viscoelastic effects. Due to the presence of streaming and viscoelasticity, a mathematical simplification is considered. The viscoelastic contribution is demonstrated through the boundary conditions. Therefore, the equations of motion are solved in the absence of the viscoelastic effects. The solutions of the linearized equations of motion under the nonlinear boundary conditions lead to a nonlinear characteristic equation governing the surface evolution. This equation is accomplished by utilizing cubic nonlinearity. Taylor theory is adopted to expand the characteristic nonlinear equation in the light of the multiple-scales technique. The perturbation analysis produces two levels of the solvability conditions, which are used to construct the GinzburgLandau equation. Stability criteria are discussed both theoretically and computationally in which stability diagrams are obtained. Under appropriate data choices, we can recover some reported works as limiting cases. The effects of the orientation of the electric fields on the stability configuration in linear as well as nonlinear approaches are discussed. PACS Nos.: 47.65.+a, 47.20.k, 47.50.+d
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".