MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980233167 · doi:10.2118/129660-ms

A Comprehensive Kinetic Theory to Model Thermolysis, Aquathermolysis, Gasification, Combustion, and Oxidation of Athabasca Bitumen

2010· article· en· W1980233167 on OpenAlex
Punitkumar R. Kapadia, Michael S. Kallos, Ian D. Gates

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphaltCrackingHydrogenCombustionOil sandsPyrolysisWaste managementMethaneSynthetic crudeEnvironmental scienceThermal decompositionRaw materialOil refineryChemistryChemical engineeringPetroleum engineeringFossil fuelMaterials scienceUnconventional oilOrganic chemistryGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Extraction and upgrading of bitumen in Alberta, Canada uses large amounts of energy, generates huge volumes of acid gas, consumes massive volumes of water, and is costly. Most bitumen produced in Alberta is converted in surface upgraders to synthetic crude oil (SCO), a 31 to 33°API oil product. Next, SCO is converted to transportation fuels and lubricants in conventional refineries. Bitumen upgrading requires hydrogen. Today, most of the hydrogen is produced by steam reforming of methane which requires huge amounts of methane. Alternatively, hydrogen can be generated by in situ gasification of bitumen. Gasification is potentially more energy efficient with reduced emissions since acid gases are sequestered to some extent in the reservoir. Also water usage is lowered and heavy metals and sulfur compounds in the bitumen tend to remain downhole. The overall objective of this research is to understand and optimize hydrogen generation from bitumen reservoirs. In situ technologies that convert bitumen to hydrogen will have direct application in bitumen upgrading, use as feedstock for ammonia and other chemicals, and may be a key step to start a hydrogen economy. One key step towards the design of in situ hydrogen generations processes is the construction of the reaction scheme together with the associated kinetic parameters. Here, a unified kinetic model that takes pyrolysis (thermolysis, thermal cracking), aquathermolysis, gasification, and combustion (oxidation) of Athabasca bitumen has been assembled. The model has been calibrated against 7 experimental and plant data sets (with 149 data points in total) and implemented in a thermal reservoir simulator. The unified kinetic model was developed by performing a global match of the reaction scheme and kinetic parameters against all available pyrolysis, aquathermolysis, gasification, combustion, and oxidation data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it