MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980244704 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.090900

Intratendinous Power Doppler Changes Related to Patient Position in Seronegative Spondyloarthritis

2010· article· en· W1980244704 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marwin Gutiérrez, Emilio Filippucci, Walter Grassi, Marcos Rosemffet

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePower dopplerAnkylosing spondylitisAxial spondyloarthritisSpondylarthritisPosition (finance)Physical therapyInternal medicineSurgeryUltrasonographySacroiliitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seronegative spondyloarthropathy (SpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that includes a heterogeneous group of diseases such as psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), reactive arthritis, arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease, and undifferentiated SpA. Enthesis and tendon involvement are 2 important aspects of SpA1. There is strong evidence that demonstrates the role of ultrasound (US) with power Doppler (PD) technique and its higher sensitivity, compared to the clinical examination, in the detection of signs of entheseal involvement in both late and early stages2. One of its main limits is operator dependency. A minimal change in the transducer position or an erroneous setting can provide completely different information, easily leading to misinterpretations. The importance of the patient’s position during the US assessment has not been well studied3,4. We investigated the effect of this phenomenon at different enthesis levels in 4 patients with SpA. US images were obtained with a MyLab 70 XVG US system (Esaote Biomedica, Genoa, Italy) with a 6–18 MHz linear transducer B-mode frequency of 18 MHz and a Doppler frequency of 9.1 …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207