MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980290475 · doi:10.1159/000109404

Induction of Atrial Depolarization Abnormality during Dipyridamole Stress Imaging: A Cautionary Note

2007· article· en· W1980290475 on OpenAlex
Laxman Prajapat, Vignendra Ariyarajah, David H. Spodick

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDipyridamoleMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineIschemiaMyocardial perfusion imagingStress testing (software)PerfusionMyocardial imagingDepolarizationMyocardial ischemiaAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P-wave widening on the 12-lead electrocardiogram denotes abnormal atrial depolarization and has been shown to be associated with myocardial ischemia during treadmill exercise tolerance testing. However, its true significance during dipyridamole (Persantine) stress imaging remains questionable given the potential direct as well as indirect effects of dipyridamole on the atria. We present a novel series of 5 comparable cases of dipyridamole stress imaging where serial P-wave duration increase occurred during administration of dipyridamole. We observed that such P-wave widening occurred even in the absence of evidence of myocardial ischemia on subsequent myocardial perfusion imaging. Clinicians should therefore be aware of this potential association where, unlike that observed with graded exercise treadmill testing, P-wave widening during dipyridamole infusion could perhaps be a pharmacological effect on the atria instead of an indication of underlying myocardial ischemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it