tBID Homooligomerizes in the Mitochondrial Membrane to Induce Apoptosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Activation of the tumor necrosis factor R1/Fas receptor results in the cleavage of cytosolic BID to truncated tBID. tBID translocates to the mitochondria to induce the oligomerization of BAX or BAK, resulting in the release of cytochrome c (Cyt c). Here we demonstrate that in tumor necrosis factor alpha-activated FL5.12 cells, tBID becomes part of a 45-kDa cross-linkable mitochondrial complex that does not include BAX or BAK. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis and co-immunoprecipitation, we demonstrate that tBID-tBID interactions occur in the mitochondria of living cells. Cross-linking experiments using a tBID-GST chimera indicated that tBID forms homotrimers in the mitochondrial membrane. To test the functional consequence of tBID oligomerization, we expressed a chimeric FKBP-tBID molecule. Enforced dimerization of FKBP-tBID by the bivalent ligand FK1012 resulted in Cyt c release, caspase activation, and apoptosis. Surprisingly, enforced dimerization of tBID did not result in the dimerization of either BAX or BAK. Moreover, a tBID BH3 mutant (G94E), which does not interact with or induce the dimerization of either BAX or BAK, formed the 45-kDa complex and induced both Cyt c release and apoptosis. Thus, tBID oligomerization may represent an alternative mechanism for inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".