MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980310007 · doi:10.1021/ic1012582

Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur(II) Dications Stabilized Using Monodentate Ligands

2010· article· en· W1980310007 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryPyridineDenticityTrifluoromethanesulfonateReactivity (psychology)SulfurMedicinal chemistryTrimethylsilylTrimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonateLigand (biochemistry)Substitution reactionOrganic chemistryMetalCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stoichiometric 1:2:2 reaction of SCl(2), trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate, and pyridine produced sulfur(II) dications featuring two pyridine donors. The complexes were reacted with unsaturated organic substrates, which displayed addition with carbon-carbon and carbon-nitrogen double bonds. The substitution on the para position of the ligand was varied by using electron donating, electron withdrawing, and neutral groups. The electronics at this position were determined to have a substantial effect on the outcome of the reaction. The presence of an electron donating group increased the Lewis basicity sufficiently to completely stop the reaction, whereas an electron withdrawing group decreased the reaction time. These observations are unique to the chemistry of sulfur(II) dications and main group polycations as a whole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it