A robust non-symmetric mixture models for image segmentation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Finite mixture model with symmetric distribution has been widely used for many computer vision and pattern recognition problems. However, in many applications, the distribution of the data has a non-Gaussian and non-symmetric form. This study presents a new non-symmetric mixture model for image segmentation. The advantage of our method is that it is simple, easy to implement and intuitively appealing. In this paper, each label is modeled with multiple D-dimensional Student's-t distribution, which is heavily tailed and more robust than Gaussian distribution. Expectation maximization (EM) algorithm is adopted to estimate model parameters and to maximize the lower bound on the data log-likelihood from observations. Numerical experiments on various data types are conducted. The performance of the proposed model is compared to other mixture models, demonstrating the robustness, accuracy and effectiveness of our method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it