MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of Monotonic and Cyclic Bending Deformations on NPS12 Wrinkled Steel Pipeline

2008· article· en· W1980333367 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBendingWrinkleFracture (geology)Materials scienceStructural engineeringDeformation (meteorology)Composite materialPipeline (software)Monotonic functionEngineeringMathematicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Full-scale laboratory tests on 1,270mm(50in.) long, 305mm(12in.) diameter steel pipes were carried out to investigate their postwrinkling behavior when subjected to monotonic and cyclic bending loads. Under monotonically increasing bending loads and deformations, the test specimens exhibited the ability to undergo significant plastic deformation and did not fail in fracture (leak or rupture in the pipe wall). However, when subjected to cyclic elastic-plastic strain reversals due to cyclic bending deformations, fracture developed at the wrinkle. This study indicated that the current pipeline design method using wrinkle limit strain is conservative. The paper presents test procedures, postwrinkling behavior, and fracture limit strain values obtained from four full-scale tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it