MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980377193 · doi:10.1002/cjce.20317

Simulation of direct leaching of zinc concentrate in a non‐ideally mixed CSTR

2010· article· en· W1980377193 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Matti Lampinen, Арто Лаари, Илкка Турунен

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContinuous stirred-tank reactorFerrousZincDissolutionLeaching (pedology)ChemistryFerricParticle sizeMass transferPopulationOxygenInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringMetallurgyMaterials scienceChromatographyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A simulation model for direct leaching of zinc concentrate in a continuous non‐ideally mixed stirred tank reactor (CSTR) is presented. The model takes into account the surface reactions between zinc in the solids and ferric iron ions in the liquid phase, oxidation of ferrous iron back to ferric iron, gas–liquid mass transfer of oxygen, decrease of particle size as the reaction proceeds, and the effect of hydrostatic pressure on the oxygen dissolution rate. The model is pseudo‐homogeneous and is approximative in the sense that it neglects the effects of particle size distributions and population balances of the concentrate particles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207