MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980384939 · doi:10.1109/plasma.2014.7012253

AC conductivity and electron transport studies in non-equilibrium warm dense gold

2014· article· en· W1980384939 on OpenAlexaff
Ying Y. Tsui, Zhijiang Chen, B. Holst, V. Recoules, G. André Ng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Material Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectronThermal conductivityConductivityHeat fluxAtomic physicsElectron temperatureFemtosecondMaterials scienceElectron transport chainLaserChemistryMolecular physicsHeat transferPhysicsThermodynamicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. We will present results of our studies on electron energy transport and AC conductivity in non-equilibrium warm dense gold produced by femtosecond laser heating. The results are deduced from single short measurements of reflectivity and transmissivity using a chirped pulse probe technique. In our electron transport study, we observed an abrupt change in energy transport in femtosecond-laser heated gold when the absorbed laser flux exceeds 7xlO'2W/cm2 [1]. Below this value, the absorbed flux is carried by ballistic transport of non-thermal electrons produced in interband excitation. Above this value, energy transport appears to include both ballistic transport by non-thermal electrons and heat diffusion by thermalized hot electrons. The ballistic component appears to be limited to a flux of 7x10 12W/cm2 [2]. In our AC conductivity study, we measured the temporal evolution of AC conductivity during electron energy relaxation in non-equilibrium warm dense gold. The measurements provide the first benchmark for testing an abinitio model that is used to calculate electron heat capacity, electron-ion coupling and AC conductivity in a single, first principles framework. While measurements of the real part of AC conductivity corroborate our theoretical temperature dependent electron heat capacity, they point to an electronion coupling factor substantially below that predicted by theory. In addition, measurements of the imaginary part of AC conductivity reveal the need to improve theoretical treatment of intraband contribution at very low photon energy [2].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLaser Material Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207