MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980389448 · doi:10.4997/jrcpe.2012.112

Is the warfarin saga over?

2012· review· en· W1980389448 on OpenAlexaff
Sam Schulman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityHamilton General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWarfarinMedicineIntensive care medicineDrugAnticoagulantClinical trialOral anticoagulantSurgeryPharmacologyInternal medicineAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Warfarin is the most widely used oral anticoagulant and has been available for more than 65 years. The last decade has brought a host of new orally available anticoagulants with promising features to clinical trials and some have already been approved for limited indications. As patients are starting to be switched to these new agents there is a need to gain understanding of the subsets of patients that will benefit the most from the new alternatives and whether warfarin is still the best choice for some subpopulations. With this knowledge we will provide the individual patient with the drug that has the best benefit/risk ratio at the same time as we conserve drug expenditures. This review discusses the directions we could follow in such a tailored anticoagulation approach, referring to the limited evidence when available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of EdinburghSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207