MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980396021 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2012-0360

Interactions of laulimalide, peloruside, and their derivatives with the isoforms of β-tubulin

2013· article· en· W1980396021 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Melissa Gajewski, Jack A. Tuszyński, Khaled Barakat, J. Torin Huzil, Mariusz Kłobukowski

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryTubulinGene isoformAffinitiesBinding affinitiesStereochemistryMicrotubuleBiochemistryCell biologyGeneBiologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The investigational anticancer agents laulimalide and peloruside are known to exert an antimitotic effect on cells by binding to β-tubulin. The binding affinities of derivatives of laulimalide and peloruside to all known isoforms of human β-tubulin were calculated using molecular mechanical, molecular dynamical, and quantum mechanical methods. Several of the derivatives are predicted to have improved β-tubulin binding affinities compared to the parent structures. These results can form the starting point for developing laulimalide or peloruside derivatives with greater specificity for the particular β-tubulin isoforms, which are overexpressed in certain tumours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207