MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980403966 · doi:10.1139/v05-160

Elimination reactions Calculation of rate constants from equilibrium constants and distortion energies by means of no barrier theory

2005· article· en· W1980403966 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
J. Peter Guthrie, Leonardo Leandro, Vladimir Pitchko

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryHalideAlkylAlkeneReaction rate constantEquilibrium constantElimination reactionComputational chemistryProtonPhysical chemistryCarbon fibersPhotochemistryThermodynamicsMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryKineticsCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No barrier theory has been applied to the E2 reactions of five alkyl bromides with ethanolic ethoxide. The model used for these reactions is that the reaction proceeds from the encounter complex of base and alkyl halide to the product encounter complex of halide ion and alkene (and alcohol), and requires five simple processes, which combine to give the concerted elimination: transfer of a proton from carbon to base; a change in geometry at the carbon which loses a proton from sp 3 to sp 2 ; breaking the C-leaving group bond; a change in geometry at the carbon which loses the leaving group from sp 3 to sp 2 ; and a change in the length of the carbon–carbon bond. The free energy of activation can be calculated with an rms error of 2.58 kcal mol –1 (1 cal = 4.184 J).Key words: Elimination, no barrier theory, rate constant, equilibrium constant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicChemical Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207