L' agriculture familiale et l' agriculture durable en Amérique du Nord: vers une agriculture "environnementalement correcte"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'auteur analyse les mesures mises en oeuvre aux Etats-Unis et au Canada et qui vont dans le sens de l' auto-responsabilisation des agriculteurs face à la protection de l'environnement et des ressources agricoles renouvelables. L'auteur défend la these que 1'émergence de cette responsabilité environnementale des agriculteurs nord-américains peut donner naissance à une agriculture durable ou "environnementalement correcte" qui se fera dans le cadre du systeme agoalimentaire actuel et qui repose des fermes familiales modemisées. Apres avoir décrit les principales mesures du dispositif agroenvironnemental du Farrn Billaméricain qui met l' accent sur la capacité de "stewarship" des agriculteurs (gestion avisée des terres au sens de "ménagement" comme le disaient Olivier de Serres, un fondateur de 1'agronomie modeme) et dont les mesures canadiennes se font aussi l' écho, I' auteur conclue en montrant que l'agriculture familiale est une forme sociale de production agricole proche du modele théorique de l' agriculture durable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".