MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980427053 · doi:10.1159/000120557

Mechanical Complications in Shunts

2008· article· en· W1980427053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Neurosurgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineShunt (medical)SurgeryHydrocephalusCatheterOcclusionComplication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A retrospective study was conducted on 1,719 hydrocephalic patients, treated between 1974 and 1983 at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto) and l'Hôpital des Enfants Malades (Paris), in order to better understand shunt failure. The statistical analysis demonstrates the following: (1) A probability of occurrence of shunt malfunction of 81% at 12 years of follow-up. (2) A high prevalence of shunt obstruction (56.1% of all malfunction) and fracture or disconnection of the tubings (13.6%). (3) A higher risk of proximal occlusion with flanged ventricular catheter. (4) Less malfunction with proximal-non-slit valves as compared to distal-slit valves. (5) The importance of pressure-flow characteristics of the shunt; because of an indirect relation between overdrainage and proximal occlusion. (6) A correlation between connectors and migration or fracture of the shunt. (7) Less distal obstructions when an open-ended distal-catheter was used. These complications were of some clinical, psychological and economical consequences. Their rate could be lowed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it