Mechanical Complications in Shunts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A retrospective study was conducted on 1,719 hydrocephalic patients, treated between 1974 and 1983 at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto) and l'Hôpital des Enfants Malades (Paris), in order to better understand shunt failure. The statistical analysis demonstrates the following: (1) A probability of occurrence of shunt malfunction of 81% at 12 years of follow-up. (2) A high prevalence of shunt obstruction (56.1% of all malfunction) and fracture or disconnection of the tubings (13.6%). (3) A higher risk of proximal occlusion with flanged ventricular catheter. (4) Less malfunction with proximal-non-slit valves as compared to distal-slit valves. (5) The importance of pressure-flow characteristics of the shunt; because of an indirect relation between overdrainage and proximal occlusion. (6) A correlation between connectors and migration or fracture of the shunt. (7) Less distal obstructions when an open-ended distal-catheter was used. These complications were of some clinical, psychological and economical consequences. Their rate could be lowed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".