MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980444717 · doi:10.1109/isie.2006.296035

Scenarios Generator for Ad Hoc Networks

2006· article· en· W1980444717 on OpenAlexaff
Léhleng Agba, François Gagnon, Ammar B. Kouki

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWireless ad hoc networkDistributed computingSoftware deploymentMobile ad hoc networkVehicular ad hoc networkMobility modelGenerator (circuit theory)Network topologyScale (ratio)Topology (electrical circuits)Computer networkWirelessSoftware engineeringTelecommunicationsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ad hoc networks offer many excellent prospects as a complementary technology to the traditional cellular networks. Nonetheless, some problems still slow down their deployment on a large scale. One of the major challenges is the random variation of the network topology. Our contribution aims at as well as possible to approach a realistic description in ad hoc scenarios definition in order to have a better analysis of the physical layer. This is useful to improve global performances of the network. We present a simulation tool, "SMGen" which allows to specify and to generate realistic tactical scenarios. The simulator implements six tactical scenarios according to a typical hierarchical structure of armies. However, it allows defining a custom scenario. The implemented mobility models are stemmed from "Gauss-Markov" (GMM) and "reference velocity group mobility" (RVGM). Many others functionalities thanks to a convivial user interface are also presented

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207