MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980466741 · doi:10.1515/corrrev.2008.373

Evolution of External Pipeline Coatings for Corrosion Protection – A Review

2008· review· en· W1980466741 on OpenAlexaff
Sankara Papavinasam, Michael Attard, R. Winston Revie

Bibliographic record

VenueCorrosion Reviews · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCorrosionCoatingEpoxyPipeline transportConversion coatingComposite materialCathodic protectionPipeline (software)PolyethyleneCrackingAsphaltMetallurgyForensic engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT External surfaces of pipelines are protected from corrosion by polymeric coatings that have evolved in the industry over the past 60 years, beginning with asphalt and then coal tar coatings, followed by polyethylene, epoxy, and urethane coatings. When a coating degrades or fails, the type of coating has an effect on the generation of environments that can cause corrosion and stress-corrosion cracking (SCC). In this paper, the types of coatings, laboratory performance, field performance, and the state-of-the-art of various pipeline coatings are reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorrosion ReviewsSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207