MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980500560 · doi:10.1177/0731684405043556

Modeling of Thermoforming of Low-density Glass Mat Thermoplastic

2005· article· en· W1980500560 on OpenAlexaff
Xuan-Tan Pham, P. J. Bates, Amy Chesney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Forming Simulation Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermoformingMaterials scienceComposite materialThermoplasticGlass fiberHyperelastic materialMoldDeformation (meteorology)PolypropyleneFinite element methodStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The glass mat thermoplastic (GMT) is made from random-chopped glass fibers and polypropylene in a sheet form. This low-density compressible material is used extensively in the automotive industry for making panels. The mechanical behavior of this material in large deformation and at thermoforming process temperature is far from being well understood. The objective of this research is to determine a constitutive law of this Azdel thermoplastic composite used for thermoforming process. A series of biaxial tests was performed to study the stress-strain behavior of the low-density thermoplastic sheet reinforced with 55% glass fiber. Different strain rates and temperatures were employed to study their effects on the mechanical behavior. Pressure-thickness model parameters were obtained using a laboratory press. A nonisothermal hyperelastic model was used for modeling this material. The results of the simulation are compared with data from a laboratory thermoforming machine and a small, simple mold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Reinforced Plastics and CompositesSame topicMetal Forming Simulation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207