MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980525283 · doi:10.1097/nmd.0b013e31819251d8

Developing a Risk-Model of Time to First-Relapse for Children and Adolescents With a Psychotic Disorder

2009· article· en· W1980525283 on OpenAlexaff
Robin E. Gearing, Irfan Mian, Aron Sholonsky, Jim Barber, David Nicholas, Ralph Lewis, Leigh Solomon, Cheryl Williams, Shawna Lightbody, Margaret Steele, Brenda Davidson, Rahul Manchanda, Llewellyn W. Joseph, Kenneth Handelman, Abel Ickowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsNorth York General HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences CentreHospital for Sick ChildrenWilliam Osler Health SystemCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthLondon Health Sciences CentreHumber River Regional HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProportional hazards modelPsychiatryMedicinePsychosisMoodMood disordersCohortSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Retrospective cohort studyBipolar disorderCohort studyPediatricsPsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Individuals treated for psychotic disorders and mood disorders with psychotic features have a high likelihood of relapse across the life course. This study examines the relapse rate and its associated predictors for children and adolescents experiencing a first-episode and develops a statistical risk-model for prediction of time to first-relapse. A multiyear, retrospective cohort design was used to track youth, under the age of 18 years, who experienced a first-episode of psychosis, and were admitted to 1 of 6 inpatient hospital psychiatric units (N = 87). Participants were followed for at least 2 years (M = 3.9, SD = 1.3) using survival analysis. Approximately 60% of subjects experienced relapse requiring hospital readmission by the end of follow-up, with 33% readmitted within the first year and 44% within 2 years. Median survival time was 34 months. Cox proportional hazards regression identified 4 key risk factors for relapse: medication nonadherence, female gender, receiving clinical treatment, and a decline in social support before first admission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Nervous and Mental DiseaseSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207