MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980529483 · doi:10.1002/jnr.21888

Stimulation of choline acetyltransferase by C3d, a neural cell adhesion molecule ligand

2008· article· en· W1980529483 on OpenAlexaff
Alison Burgess, Saumya Saini, Yingqi Weng, Isabelle Aubert

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCholine acetyltransferaseStimulationAcetyltransferaseLigand (biochemistry)Neural cell adhesion moleculeNeuroscienceChemistryCell biologyCell adhesionAdhesionCell adhesion moleculeCholineBiochemistryCellBiophysicsBiologyCentral nervous systemReceptorOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Septal cholinergic neurons project to the hippocampus and release acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter involved in learning and memory. The enzyme choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) is responsible for synthesizing acetylcholine. Promoting ChAT activity and acetylcholine release can lead to new treatments for neurodegenerative diseases with cholinergic deficits, such as Alzheimer's disease. We present evidence that the synthetic molecule C3d, which is a peptide mimetic of the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), promotes ChAT activity in cultures of rat embryonic septal neurons. Our data demonstrate that ChAT activity triggered by C3d is dependent on the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. C3d did not affect the number of cholinergic neurons in culture, indicating that NCAM homophilic binding enhances ChAT activity, without affecting cholinergic cell survival. In conclusion, the NCAM mimetic peptide C3d promotes ChAT activity in septal neurons through FGFR and MAPK. These findings are relevant to the design of new strategies aimed at stimulating cholinergic function and improving cognition in disorders such as Alzheimer's disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroscience ResearchSame topicCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207