MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980577621 · doi:10.1142/s012905410400242x

ON THE PALINDROMIC COMPLEXITY OF INFINITE WORDS

2004· article· en· W1980577621 on OpenAlexaff
Srečko Brlek, Sylvie Hamel, Maurice Nivat, Christophe Reutenauer

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Foundations of Computer Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalindromeMathematicsCombinatorics on wordsSet (abstract data type)Product (mathematics)EnumerationSimple (philosophy)CombinatoricsExistential quantificationDiscrete mathematicsWord (group theory)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the problem of constructing infinite words having a prescribed finite set P of palindromes. We first establish that the language of all words with palindromic factors in P is rational. As a consequence we derive that there exists, with some additional mild condition, infinite words having P as palindromic factors. We prove that there exist periodic words having the maximum number of palindromes as in the case of Sturmian words, by providing a simple and easy to check condition. Asymmetric words, those that are not the product of two palindromes, play a fundamental role and an enumeration is provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations106
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Foundations of Computer ScienceSame topicsemigroups and automata theoryFrench-language works237,207