MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980586915 · doi:10.1179/174328407x176901

Formation of microstructure in Ag–In–Sn solder alloys

2007· article· en· W1980586915 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
L. Snugovsky, Polina Snugovsky, Doug D. Perovic, J. W. Rutter

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Science and Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsIntermetallicMaterials scienceLiquidusSolderingMicrostructureMetallurgyAlloyTernary operation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A metallographic study is reported of the phases and reactions that occur in Ag–In–Sn (Pb-free) solder alloys containing approximately 3 wt-%Ag and up to 10 wt-%In. Specimens were prepared by very slow unidirectional solidification and as small castings. Three different intermetallic compound phases and two different matrix phases were observed, depending on the In content of the alloy. The probable reactions that produce these phases are discussed and compared with data from the published ternary liquidus projection. This study was carried out in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, as part of the CMAP program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials Science and TechnologySame topicElectronic Packaging and Soldering TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207