MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980586924 · doi:10.1115/1.4002586

Calibration of Modular Reconfigurable Robots Based on a Hybrid Search Method

2010· article· en· W1980586924 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designWorkspaceSet (abstract data type)Computer scienceCalibrationRobotConfiguration spaceMonte Carlo methodAlgorithmMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developed in this paper is a hybrid method for calibration of modular reconfigurable robots (MRRs). The underlying problem under study is unique to MRRs, that is, how to calibrate a set of MRR’s geometric parameters that are applicable to all feasible configurations. For this reason, a hybrid search method is developed to ensure a global search over the MRRs’ workspace for each feasible configuration. By combining a genetic algorithm method with a Monte Carlo method, this method includes three levels of search, namely, pose, workspace, and configuration-space. The final set of global solutions is generated progressively from the results of these three levels of search. The effectiveness of this method is demonstrated through a case study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it