MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980595956 · doi:10.5194/angeo-26-185-2008

Multi-instrument observations of a large scale Pc4 pulsation

2008· article· en· W1980595956 on OpenAlexfundno aff
L. B. N. Clausen, T. K. Yeoman, R. Behlke, E. Lucek

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales Geophysicae · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Space and Astronautical ScienceUniversity of Newcastle AustraliaEuropean CommissionUniversity of LeicesterCanadian Space AgencyUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsPhysicsPoynting vectorMagnetosphereWave packetMagnetometerGeophysicsComputational physicsEarth's magnetic fieldHarmonicAlfvén waveLocal timeField lineIonosphereMagnetic fieldAtomic physicsAcousticsMagnetohydrodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. On 7 November 2005 various ground based and spaced based instruments registered five wave packets with frequencies in the Pc4 range. The most prominent of the five wave packets was observed in ground based magnetometer data spanning almost all latitudes on the dayside magnetosphere. The propagation from the dayside into the tail is deduced from Poynting flux calculations of Cluster data and an onset time analysis of the ground based magnetometer data. This suggests an upstream source. Backstreaming ions are identified to be the most probable source mechanism for this event. Due to the fortunate configuration of the Cluster satellites, the harmonic structure of the wave is analysed and compared with cross-phase spectra from ground data. We present evidence that the driving wave resonantly interacted with geomagnetic field lines. The data suggests that resonant driving occurred at stations where the driving frequency was harmonically related to the local fundamental frequency, creating FLR-like signatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales GeophysicaeSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207